Over the weekend we all got to watch Udonis Haslem large tattoo of the state of Florida covering his entire back. I'm not anti-tats, matter of fact I have two of my own. Although neither one of mine is of a state or as large as Haslem's. Nonetheless, I'm not going to criticize him for getting a tat, but I will criticize him for getting a tattoo of the state of Florida. If it was the state of Cali, then I'd be OK with it. Also as we speak of tats, Ohio State true-sophomore QB Terrelle Pryor decided to add some ink to his forearm. It's official now, Mr. Pryor reps Ohio State and has no plans of transferring now. So what's worse the tat that covers your entire back of the state where you played your college ball or a tat of your school symbol on your forearm? It's debatable, but I'm always up to hear an argument or two...sometimes three.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Which tat is better??
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
I think both tats are ridiculous... just my personal opinion. I'm all for tat's (especially strategically planned and placed ones that happen to be on your ass HA HA HA) but don't GO BIG on colleges or states. Imagine how screwed I would have been if I would have gotten a Wildcat!
Post a Comment